User Tools

Site Tools


field_methods:canopy_gap_intercept

Report a bug, broken link, or incorrect content

Canopy Gap Intercept


written by Jason Karl and Karen Colson

Method Type

Cover - Quantitative

Other Names

None known

Description and Uses

Canopy Gap Intercept measurements represent the proportion of a line covered by large gaps between plant canopies and is an important indicator of the potential for wind erosion and weed invasion. Canopy cover is measured along a line intercept transect by documenting the point along the tape at which the canopy begins and ends.

This method is best used on species that have dense canopies (e.g., shrubs) as opposed to species with narrow canopies (e.g., grasses). It is also difficult with any species (shrub, grass or forb) with lacy canopies because of the amount of small intercepts that would need to be recorded.

Advantages and Limitations

Cover is one of the most commonly used measures when conducting community monitoring. However, there are limitations. One limitation of the canopy gap technique is when comparing results of canopy gap to other projects, the protocol for determining what a gap is may vary. Because most plant canopies have gaps, which can be formed by dead centers, matting of plants, gaps between grass blades and shrub branches etc., a protocol for dealing with these gaps must be developed. For example, some variations call for the observer to identify the canopy as closed until the gap exceeds a predetermined width. Even within a project, if this protocol is not clearly documented it can lead to inconsistencies among observers. If the sighting line is not perpendicular to the tape or plumb, observer bias can also be a problem. Wind can also influence the angle of the plant, resulting in a larger surface than would be present under normal conditions. Some disadvantages with cover measurements in general is that they can change dramatically over the growing season, making timing of sampling very important. In addition, cover measures are sensitive to changes in number (mortality and recruitment) and vigor (annual biomass production) making it difficult to interpret cover trends.

Manuals

Video Instructions/Demonstration

Technical and Application References

  • Bonham, C.D. 1989. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

Similar Approaches

Basal Gap Intercept measures the proportion of the line covered by large gaps between plant bases and is important as an indicator of runoff and water erosion. Herrick et al. 2005 suggest using both the canopy and gap intercept methods together in combination with the cover indicators from the Line-Point Intercept and the Soil Stability Method to help determine whether observed erosion changes are due to loss of cover, changes in spatial distribution of vegetation or reduced soil stability.

Additional Information

Data Forms

Printable data forms for the Canopy Gap Intercept method can be downloaded from

Electronic data forms can be found at the following sites

Web Search Results

Loading...
Loading...

Discussion/Comments

You must have an account and be logged in to post or reply to the discussion topics below. Click here to login or register for the site.

field_methods/canopy_gap_intercept.txt · Last modified: 2013/09/24 16:02 by jgillan